Which collaboration platform is better for you?
If you are a programmer, part of an open-source team, or just an open-source fan, having an account with a code collaboration platform is a must. It not only allows better project management but also is a great way of code sharing. Before comparing two of the most popular code collaboration platforms, let’s first understand what an ideal code collaboration platform should be like.
What is a collaboration platform?
A collaboration platform is a service which let’s groups of individuals work together without needing to worry about their work conflicting or affecting someone else’s work.
Today, most of the collaboration platforms focus on providing services to programmers and hence are called code collaboration platform. Code collaboration platforms, unlike traditional collaboration platforms, are used heavily by individual programmers. This promotes open-source and code sharing. Projects on code collaboration platforms also have a place in resumes.
GitHub is the world’s most well-known code collaboration platform. It is stable, solid and very supportive. The primary objective of GitHub is to earn profit from groups and companies who want to keep their work private as public repositories are completely free.
This doesn’t prove very good for individuals as they cannot keep their repositories private while open-source groups find it very efficient. Not only they can have a large group for free, GitHub also does a great job patronizing their work.
GitHub also provides unlimited cloud storage space to each of its users whether individuals or groups. GitHub doesn’t put any restrictions on the content of the repositories either making it suitable for artists, poets and other professionals as well.
The above points make GitHub one of the most preferred choices for open-source developers as well as large companies. As a matter of fact and pride for GitHub, large institutions like NASA as well as Google, use it exclusively.
But GitHub is not the best collaboration platform for individual workers, albeit very popular among them as well. This has lead to the formation of other code collaboration platforms which are putting up tough competitions with GitHub. One of them is BitBucket which tries to be more efficient for individuals which trying to earn profit out of groups.
BitBucket, although not as popular as GitHub, is the choice of millions of individuals. It not only is better for individuals, but equally good for small groups of five or less than five people. The services provided and their price is the same for both. The main sources of income for BitBucket are large organizations and companies.
BitBucket’s main advantage over GitHub is that it provides an unlimited number of free private repositories. This alone makes BitBucket preferable over GitHub in many ways. First, it provides all services free of cost to individuals and small groups. Second, paid larger groups can have as many private repositories as they want. Neither of these features is available on GitHub.
While GitHub and BitBucket are competitors in the same field, it is quite easy to decide which one is better in which circumstances.
GitHub provides unlimited free open repositories no matter what the size of the group might be. GitHub charges only for private repositories. On the other hand, BitBucket provides unlimited private repositories to individuals and small groups while charging only larger groups.
Show your feedback in Comments below.
Like our Facebook page for more interesting posts on your wall!